Discover how a proactive PMCF strategy drives innovation, builds trust, and secures market leadership.
Transforming a regulatory necessity into a competitive edge begins with a proactive Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) strategy. By going beyond compliance and actively gathering real-world clinical data, manufacturers can uncover valuable insights that inspire innovation, strengthen product performance, and address patient needs more effectively. This approach not only ensures MDR readiness but also builds long-term trust with healthcare professionals, patients, and regulatory bodies. Ultimately, a well-executed PMCF strategy becomes more than a legal requirement—it becomes a powerful driver of market leadership and sustainable growth
The Hierarchy of Responsibility
Global Regulatory Approaches
While both the EU and US prioritize safety, their philosophies differ, requiring a nuanced global strategy.
This chart illustrates the conceptual difference in regulatory burden. The EU MDR requires proactive PMCF for nearly all devices, while the FDA’s mandatory Section 522 studies are a more targeted intervention for specific high-risk devices.
Architecting a Defensible PMCF Program
A successful PMCF program is a continuous cycle of planning, execution, and analysis that feeds critical insights back into your device’s technical documentation
service related FAQ’s
The drug Master Files are divided into 4 Types
Type I: Manufacturing Site, Facilities, Operating Procedures, and Personnel
Type II: Drug Substance, Drug Substance Intermediate, and Material Used in Their Preparation, or Drug Product
Type III: Packaging Material
Type IV: Excipient, Colorant, Flavor, Essence, or Material Used in Their Preparation
Type V: FDA Accepted Reference Information
We provide US Agent service and E copy submission service. We also help with DMF preparation.
Yes, we provide full support for UDI implementation and registration in compliance with EU MDR 2017/745 and IVDR 2017/746 requirements. Our team assists manufacturers in assigning and structuring UDI-DI and UDI-PI codes based on the device classification and intended use. We also help in ensuring proper placement of UDI on labeling, packaging, and Instructions for Use (IFU), as well as preparing for UDI module submission once it becomes fully functional within EUDAMED.
Our services cover:
-
UDI-DI and UDI-PI structure guidance
-
Compliance with GS1, HIBCC, or ICCBBA issuing agencies
-
UDI label and packaging review
-
Preparation for EUDAMED UDI/Device registration module
-
UDI-related documentation for your Technical File and CE submission
By integrating UDI properly, we help ensure device traceability, reduce market delays, and support full regulatory compliance across the EU.
Form MD-22: This is the application form submitted to the Central Licensing Authority (CLA) (i.e., DCGI under CDSCO) to seek permission for conducting a clinical investigation of a new medical device or an investigational medical device without a predicate device in India.
Form MD-23: If the CLA is satisfied with the application, it grants permission to conduct the clinical investigation through Form MD-23. This permission allows the sponsor to begin the study in accordance with an approved clinical investigation plan reviewed by a registered Ethics Committee.
Additional requirements:
-
The clinical investigation must be registered with the Clinical Trials Registry – India (CTRI) before the enrolment of the first participant.
-
The first participant must be enrolled within one year of the grant of permission; otherwise, fresh permission from the CLA is required.
No. Human Factors studies complement but do not replace clinical evaluation. They specifically assess device-user interaction, whereas clinical evaluation assesses clinical performance, safety, and benefits.
- Improved Document Control
- Effective Audit Management
- Better Employee Training Programs
- Better Risk Management
- Efficient Tracking and Reporting
- Improved Supplier Quality
- Robust CAPA Processes
